Next Article in Journal
Environmentally Sensitive Elements in Groundwater of an Industrial Town in India: Spatial Distribution and Human Health Risk
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of Methods to Repair and Maintain Lithophilic Fish Spawning Habitat
Previous Article in Journal
Contribution of the Amazon River Discharge to Regional Sea Level in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endemic Freshwater Fish Range Shifts Related to Global Climate Changes: A Long-Term Study Provides Some Observational Evidence for the Mediterranean Area

1
Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, via Elce di Sotto, 06100 Perugia, Italy
2
Center “Climate Change and Biodiversity in Lakes and Wetlands” of Arpa Umbria, 06100 Perugia, Italy
3
Forest, Economics and Mountain Territory Service, Umbria Region, 06100 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(11), 2349; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112349
Submission received: 7 October 2019 / Revised: 30 October 2019 / Accepted: 4 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impacts of Human Activities and Climate Change on Freshwater Fish)

Abstract

:
Climate changes will lead to a worsening of the ecological conditions, in terms of hydrological instability and rising water temperatures, of the Mediterranean rivers. Freshwater fishes inhabiting this area can be threatened in the near future by accelerating drought and decreased ecological connectivity. The main aim of the research was to analyze changes in the distribution of the endemic freshwater fishes Padogobius nigricans, Squalius lucumonis and Telestes muticellus in the Tiber River basin (Italy), within a proven period of climate warming, in terms of increasing water temperature and droughts. A multivariate analysis was conducted using fish and environmental data collected in 117 sites over the years 1990–2017. For the three species, population abundance, age structure and body condition were analyzed. Detectability, occupancy, local extinction and colonization processes were also examined. We showed that S. lucumonis and T. muticellus have shifted their distributions upstream, likely in order to reach their thermal optimum. Padogobius nigricans did not move upstream significantly, since the species is characterized by limited vagility and thus a low dispersal capability in a context of high river fragmentation. In the study area, elevation and river barriers seem to play a key role in extirpation and colonization processes; for S. lucumonis and T. muticellus the extinction probability decreased with increasing altitude, while for P. nigricans the colonization probability decreased with an increasing degree of river fragmentation. These results highlight how species-specific dispersal ability can lead to varying adaptability to climate change.

1. Introduction

The Mediterranean area is considered a biodiversity hotspot due to the presence of a large number of endemic species [1], which includes many freshwater fishes [2]. In particular, inland waters are characterized by high levels of fish biodiversity [3]. Considering the limited dispersal ability of primary fish species (see Myers [4]), freshwater ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to many anthropogenic stressors, because they represent more isolated and fragmented environments than terrestrial ecosystems [5]. Habitat alteration, invasive species, water pollution and abstraction, and over fishing are among the main threats [3] leading to 56% of endemic freshwater fish in the Mediterranean basin being threatened [2]. The negative effects of these multiple stressors can be enhanced by global climate change [6,7,8]. Climate changes will in effect lead to a worsening of ecological conditions, in terms of hydrological instability and decreased connectivity, of the Mediterranean watercourses [9]. As a result of climate change, increasing drought and the progressive deterioration of water quality in aquatic environments of this area can be predicted in the near future, with a consequent decrease in freshwater biodiversity [10].
Climate change can produce direct effects on fish at individual, population, species, and community levels [11]. With regards to the species level, different fish species do not react in the same way [12,13]; some species are much more susceptible to the impacts of climate change than others, due to different biological, ecological features and various life-history strategies [14]. In particular, the distribution of the most vulnerable species could be largely influenced by climate-induced effects such as rising temperatures and water availability [7,15,16]. In fact, as a short-term response to climate change, species can look for the most appropriate environmental conditions and try to follow them moving in space [17,18]. In watercourses, these displacements mainly occur in a longitudinal direction, given the presence of an upstream–downstream gradient that strongly affects the structure of fish assemblages [19,20]. As a result of increases in water temperature, caused by decreased rainfall and increases in water abstraction and evapotranspiration, some studies revealed a tendency for fish species to move upstream, towards a thermal optimum [7,21,22]. However, it should be considered that species’ movements upstream can be hindered by insurmountable barriers or by unsuitable environmental conditions, and that it may be necessary for moving species to establish new biotic interactions within newly colonized habitats [23,24]. In this case, the species that will not be able to adapt to new conditions will be at risk of local extinction [8].
The water bodies of Central and Southern Italy are particularly threatened by climate change. Flow rates of the Apennine chain watercourses are closely linked to atmospheric precipitations. Climate models predict an exacerbation of their torrential characteristics, with an intensification of extreme meteorological phenomena and reduced flow rates in the summer season [9]. This situation is further aggravated by increases in water withdrawals for irrigation purposes [25,26]. The Tiber River basin (Central Italy) is characterized by the presence of a large number of endemic fish species with limited areal distribution which are, therefore, highly vulnerable to extinction [27,28]. In fact, the loss of flow occurring in the Tiber River basin during periods of drought can lead to the isolation of endemic species with limited thermal tolerance. Three species in particular are subject to the potential effects of climate change in this area: the Etruscan chub Squalius lucumonis (Bianco 1983), the Italian riffle dace Telestes muticellus (Bonaparte, 1837), and the Arno goby Padogobius nigricans (Canestrini, 1867). Squalius lucumonis is an endemic species with a distribution limited to three river basins in Central Italy [29,30]; the species is listed as endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list of threatened species [31], and the progressive reduction of the species range is due to habitat alterations and water withdrawals [30]. Telestes muticellus is endemic to Northern and Central Italy; it prefers moderately cool waters in upper stream reaches [32]. Padogobius nigricans is a species endemic to Central Italy. It is listed as vulnerable in the IUCN red list of threatened species [31] because it is threatened by habitat alterations and competition with the Padanian goby Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) [33,34], a species endemic to Northern Italy introduced in the Tiber river basin in 1993 [35]. These three species inhabit small watercourses in the upper part of the Tiber basin, which represent refuge areas in comparison with downstream reaches and lowland rivers, which are compromised by the combined action of water pollution and presence of many exotic species [23]. However, these refuge areas have marked torrential features and are subject to drought periods during the dry seasons. Currently there is scarce information in the literature on the thermal niche of the three species; however many studies showed their reophilic characteristics and their location in the middle-upper section of the rivers, where current speed and dissolved oxygen are quite high and water is mildly cool [27,28,29]. Among all the fish species occurring in the study area with limited thermal tolerance, P. nigricans, T. muticellus and S. lucumonis seemed to be particularly suitable for evaluating the fish distribution shifts in freshwater ecosystems, since they are not a target for sport fishing, and they are not subject to stocking activities.
At present, there are not many studies concerning freshwater fish distribution range shifts linked to climate change, especially based on extended series of empirical data. Many evaluations regarding this topic are based only on the application of predictive models. In the present study, long-term environmental and fish observational data series were used to test the potential effects of climate changes on freshwater fish habitat preferences. In particular, the research aims were: (i) to highlight some environmental effects of climate change in watercourses of the upper section of the Tiber River basin; (ii) to analyze some changes of ecological preferences and the distribution range of P. nigricans, T. muticellus and S. lucumonis over time, probably related to climate warming.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Tiber River is the third-longest river in Italy and has the second-largest watershed, with a total surface of 12,692 km2. The study area comprised 62 watercourses of the upper Tiber River basin (Figure 1) and encompassed a surface of 9413 km2, equal to 55% of the total drainage area. The study area includes four sub-basins corresponding to the main tributaries of the Tiber River: Chiascio, Nera, Nestore and Paglia River basins. Our analyses utilized data collected during the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017, in 117 sampling sites. All the sampling sites were sampled once for each census period, in autumn.
From a hydro-geological point of view the study area is mainly characterized by low permeability and marked flow rate oscillations; the Nera River basin represents an exception because, being composed of highly permeable carbonate rock complexes, it guarantees regular water conditions. The complete hydrographic network is characterized by the presence of numerous interruptions of river continuity, such as human-made weirs and dams. Agricultural land occupies about 50% of the study area. This aspect significantly affects the exploitation of surface water for irrigation purposes, especially during the summer season.

2.2. Data Collection

Relative to the census periods 1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017, a census of the fish fauna by two-pass electrofishing was carried out at each sampling location, using the removal method [36,37]. Sampling was conducted during low flow periods using a continuous or pulsed current with power between 600 and 4000 W. Each river stretch of length between 50–100 m was sampled from downstream to upstream direction twice consecutively, applying the same level of fishing effort [38]. All captured fishes were identified and counted in order to estimate the density (ind m−2) and the standing crop (g m−2) for each population. For all specimens, total length (TL) and weight (W) were measured and a scale sample was collected to determine age. Data collection from 1990 to 1997 comprised single-pass electrofishing data and therefore fish population density was not available, despite this is was important to include the data to have a longer time series. Therefore a comparable approach using species abundance uses a coding from zero to three based on the following categories: 0 = absent; 1 = rare; 2 = common; 3 = dominant.
Given that habitat features strongly influence the distribution of fish species and the composition of fish assemblages [39,40], 16 environmental parameters were used to characterize river stretches. Conductivity (μS cm−1), pH (units), water temperature (°C) and dissolved oxygen (mg L−1) were measured in the field at the same time of fish sampling, using electronic meters manufactured by YSI, Hanna Instruments and WTW GmbH. The hydrological parameters (flow rate m3 s−1 and current speed m s−1) were measured at the cross-sectional area of each sampling reach, using an OTT MF-pro electromagnetic current meter manufactured by OTT Hydromet. Other chemical parameters of water (chlorides, sulphates, phosphates, ammonia) were subsequently measured in the laboratory according to the environmental protection agencies specifications [41,42,43]. Water samples were collected into 1 L polyethylene bottles at the same time of fish sampling from the water surface, as the depth values ranged from 0.07 to 199.00 cm (mean ± standard deviation (SD) = 0.35 ± 0.24). All samples were transported on ice to the laboratory. Watershed area (km−2), distance from the source (km), and altitude (m a.s.l.) were derived from digital maps (geographic information system (GIS)) provided by the Forest, Economics and Mountain Territory Service of the Umbria Region. In order to evaluate water quality based on the presence of macro-invertebrates, the Extended Biotic Index (EBI) was used [44] (for more details, see [45]). To examine the opportunity for fish species to move upstream, the presence of dams and weirs located in the hydrographic network were detected and their geographical coordinates were derived using a GARMIN global positioning system (GPS) map 62 s with accuracy <10 m. The river fragmentation degree has been codified as the number of weirs with height >80 cm present downstream of each sampling site, up to the main receptor watercourse.
The Hydrographic Service of the Umbria Region provided continuous data of water temperature (°C) and flow rate (m3 s−1); both parameters were measured with automatic monitoring stations. Water temperature data was collected hourly from 2005 to 2016, at three sampling sites located on the Tiber, Topino and Clitunno Rivers, coded as Tiber River 3, Topino River 2 and Clitunno River 1, respectively. Flow rate data was collected hourly at five sampling sites: three sites were located on the Tiber River (coded as Tiber River 1, 2, 3), one site on the Topino River (coded as Topino River 1), and one site on the Chiani River (Chiani River 1) (Figure 1). The stations were chosen based on the representativeness of the entire hydrographic network and of the completeness of available data series. Flow rate calculations were performed using average monthly data.

2.3. Body Condition and Size Structure Estimation

In order to highlight changes in body condition over time, for S. lucumonis and T. muticellus relative weight (Wr) was assessed using the following equation: Wr = 100 (W/Ws) where body weight = W (g) and standard weight = Ws (same species in good physiological condition). The relative weight (Wr) is a condition index based on the comparison between the real weight of an individual, and the optimal weight of a specimen of the same species in good physiological condition (Ws). Wr values lower than 95 indicate poor body condition [46,47]. Wr estimation allows evaluation of the physiological status of a fish [48] and to highlight the occurrence of ecological changes over time [47]. In the present study the standard weight Ws was calculated using the following equations calculated with the empirical percentile (EmP) method [49,50].
S. lucumonis: log10(Ws) = −7.750 + 5.750 log10TL − 0.660 (log10TL)2; TL application (cm) range 7–34,
T. muticellus: log10(Ws) = −3.706 + 1.685 log10TL − 0.349 (log10TL)2; TL application (cm) range 6–17.
For P. nigricans, since the equation for calculating Ws is not available, body condition was estimated using the relative condition factor (Kn) [51] using the equation: Kn = 100 W/(a TLb), where a and b are the regression coefficients of the length–weight relationship (LWR) equation estimated from the total sample by the least-squares method [52], based on the logarithmic equation: log10W(g) = a + b log10TL (cm). In order to avoid biases related to the accuracy of the weight measure, only fish of a total length larger than 4.0 cm were used to perform the analysis.
In order to provide a numeric estimation for deviations of the population structure from a balanced population, for P. nigricans, S. lucumonis and T. muticellus the proportional stock density (PSD) index [53] was calculated as follows:
PSD = 100 (number of fish ≥ minimum quality length/number of fish ≥ minimum stock length).
For T. muticellus, for minimum quality length and minimum stock length were used the values indicated by Pedicillo [54] for the populations of Central Italy. For P. nigricans and S. lucumonis, the minimum length thresholds for index calculations were established adopting the percentages suggested by Gabelhouse [53] and calculated on the basis of the largest specimen in the data set. The PSD values varied from 0 to 100 and the optimal range for a balanced population was: 35 ≤ PSD ≤ 65 [53,55].

2.4. Data Analysis

In order to evaluate temporal changes in water temperature and flow rate (dependent variables), linear regressions with years (independent) were performed. The significance of each relationship was tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA); the significance of the regression coefficient was tested using t-test analysis.
Since for P. nigricans, T. muticellus and S. lucumonis the population densities, the body condition and size structure indices were measured at the same sites across 3 periods (1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017), in order to test their changes over time a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed. Data were tested for sphericity using the Mauchly test, and the Greenhouse-Geisser and Huynh-Feldt adjustements were used. All the statistical analysis mentioned above were performed using Dell STATISTICA 13 software (Dell Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) for Windows.
In order to analyze the relationships amongst environmental and fish species data matrices for the four sampling periods (1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017), canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) [56] was performed. The CCA was processed with the CANOCO statistical package for Windows 4.5. Following Lepš and Šmilauer [57], since environmental and biological data were in the form of repeated measurements, the analysis was performed using time (i.e., census period) as a covariate. In order to avoid biases relate to the unimodality of the method, five sampling sites located less than a kilometer from a weir were excluded from the analysis. The environmental matrices included 16 variables (altitude, average current speed, chlorides, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, distance from the source, EBI, EBI quality class, flow rate, NNH3, pH, PPO4, river fragmentation degree (units), sulphates, water temperature, watershed area) and 112 observations (sampling sites). The fish matrices included 42 variables (fish species) and 112 observations (sampling sites). In order to make the data of the abundances detected in the four census periods comparable, for the years 1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017, the species’ abundances were coded using a scale ranging from zero to three based on the population density (0 ind m−2 = absent; <0.05 = rare; 0.05 to 0.1 = common; >0.1 = dominant). All the variables (N) used in the analysis were transformed [log10(N + 1)] to normalize their distributions [58] and standardized to a mean of zero and standard deviation of 1. Statistical significance was tested using the Monte Carlo permutation test (999 permutations). For S. lucumonis, P. nigricans and T. muticellus, differences in average altitude values among all four sampling periods were tested using ANOVA, taking into consideration only the sites in which the species were present. ANOVA was performed using Dell STATISTICA 13 software for Windows.
Differences in water temperature preferences amongst sampling periods 1990–1997 and 2012–2017 were tested using t-test analysis. For the same species, with the aim to graphically represent their response curves in relation to altitude, and to highlight changes over time, a generalized linear model (GLM) was performed for each census period. GLM was performed with the CANOCO statistical package for Windows 4.5.
A multi-season model was used to estimate the occupancy, colonization, extinction and detection probabilities for S. lucumonis, T. muticellus and P. nigricans in the study area. The estimation was performed using presence-absence data for 117 survey sites across four periods (period 1: 1990–1997; period 2: 1998–2004; period 3: 2005–2011; period 4: 2012–2017). Elevation and degree of river fragmentation were used as site covariates, while water temperature was used as sample covariate. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) [59], was used to select the best candidate model. Following Burnham and Anderson [60], all models within 2 AIC units were considered. The analysis was processed using the program PRESENCE for Windows.

3. Results

3.1. Climate Changes

All three rivers showed significant, increasing trends in rising water temperatures over a 11 years period (Figure 2). Regression coefficients resulted highly statistically significant at the t-test analysis (p < 0.001). Water temperature increased from the period 2005–2010 to 2011–2016 by a mean of 0.4 °C for Topino (y = 6.21 + 0.0002x; r = 0.05; F = 213.29; p = 0.0001) and Tiber (y = 4.83 + 0.001x; r = 0.05, F = 242.39; p = 0.0001) and by 0.8 °C for Clitunno (y = 10.47 + 0.0006x; r = 0.22; F = 3733.83; p = 0.0001).
The annual average flow rates showed a clear decreasing trend over time in the Chiani and Topino rivers than for the Tiber River. In both cases, the time series of data available (years 1992–2016) was shorter than the Tiber River (years 1920–2016) (Figure 3). All relationships resulted as statistically significant at the ANOVA analysis (p < 0.05); the regression coefficients resulted statistically significant at the t-test analysis (p < 0.05).

3.2. Distribution Shift

The comparison between distribution maps related to the census periods 1990–1997 and 2012–2017 demonstrated the changes that occurred over time in the distribution of the three endemic species (Figure 4). S. lucumonis and T. muticellus appeared to extend their distribution range to some tributaries of the Tiber River in the northeast part of the basin, whilst the disappearance of S. lucumonis from the middle section of the Tiber River was detected. The number of sites all three fish species were increased from time period 1 (1990–1997) to time period 2 (2012–2017) by 4 sites for S. lucumonis, 10 sites for T. muticellus and 51 for P. nigricans. For S. lucumonis and T. muticellus the occupancy-elevation plots provided evidence for upper range limits expansion over time (Figure 5a,b). For P. nigricans the plot suggested an overall range expansion of the species over time (Figure 5c). Over the four census periods (1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011 and 2012–2017) the comparison among the mean altitude values of sites in which the species were present, carried out by ANOVA, showed that S. lucumonis and T. muticellus distribution ranges significantly shifted to higher altitudes, resulting in a mean increase of 40.5 and 33.7 m, respectively (Figure 6a,b). In both cases, the ANOVA results were statistically significant (S. lucumonis: F3, 252 = 1.96, p = 0.02; T. muticellus: F3, 366 = 2.32, p = 0.02). By contrast, the distribution range of P. nigricans did not significantly move upstream (F3, 176 = 0.32, p = 0.81) (Figure 6c). To highlight the thermal conditions over time of the sites inhabited by the species, that could be related to their ability to shift, the mean water temperature values between the older census period (1991–1997) and most recent years (2012–2017) were compared using t-test analysis. The comparison resulted highly statistically significant for P. nigricans (1991–1997 mean value ± SD = 12.29 °C ± 5.23, range 2.0–20.0 °C; 2012–2017 mean value ± SD = 15.23 °C ± 3.93, range 6.0–23.7; t = 3.01, p = 0.003). For S. lucumonis (1991–1997 mean value ± SD = 14.95 °C ± 5.51, range 3.0–23.6 °C; 2012–2017 mean value ± SD = 15.01 °C ± 3.10, range 10.4–23.2; t = 0.05, p = 0.956) and T. muticellus (1991–1997 mean value ± SD = 13.53 °C ± 4.49, range 2.0–22.7 °C; 2012–2017 mean value ± SD = 13.87 °C ± 3.53, range 6.0–23.2; t = 0.43, p = 0.672) the t-test analysis did not show significant differences between the two periods.
The axes 1 and 2 of CCA explained 77.6% of the total variability and the analysis resulted highly statistically significant at the Monte Carlo test (F = 6.75, p = 0.001, total inertia = 2.996). Except for the pH, all environmental parameters resulted significantly related to the first axis of CCA, which represented the longitudinal gradient of the rivers (Table 1). Altitude, average current speed, distance from the source, flow rate, river fragmentation degree and watershed area resulted significantly inversely related to Axis 2, whilst chlorides, conductivity, PPO4 and SO4 were positively related to the same axis (Table 1). The species projection points showed for S. lucumonis and T. muticellus the strong link with elevation. The proximity of the points corresponding to S. lucumonis, T. muticellus and P. nigricans confirmed that the three species often occur together (Figure 7).
For S. lucumonis and T. muticellus the GLM results showed a progressive shift of the species towards river stretches located at higher altitudes, confirming their tendency to move upstream along the longitudinal gradient of the river (Figure 8a,b). For P. nigricans the GLM results showed a progressive increase of population abundances over time, whilst they did not result a significant variation in altitude preferences of the species (Figure 8c).
The distribution map of river barriers in the study area showed the presence of 188 weirs of more than 80 cm height (referred to the physical structure) and seven dams of more than 20 m height located in the whole hydrographic network (Figure 9).

3.3. Population Status

Population density increased over time for all three species; except for S. lucumonis (Figure 10a), for the other species repeated measures ANOVA showed highly significant differences between periods (p < 0.01) (Figure 10b,c). As regards the body condition trend over time, the differences between periods were statistically significant at the repeated measures ANOVA only for S. lucumonis (p = 0.005), even if the mean values resulted in always being below the lower limit of the optimal range 95–105 (Figure 10a). The differences over time of mean PSD values resulted significant for T. muticellus (p = 0.013), with the average values calculated for the periods 2005–2010 and 2011–2017 falling within the optimal range of 35–65. In the case of P. nigricans, the results of repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant, progressive decrease in average values over time (p = 0.002), with the PSD values consistently above the optimal range, indicating the lack of young specimens in the sample (Figure 10c).

3.4. Occupancy, Colonization, Extirpation and Detection Probabilities

Detection probability was high for all three species ranging from 0.79 (P. nigricans) to 0.74 (S. lucumonis), with no results of perfect detection (1.00). Analyzing the detectability values for the 4 time periods, some differences emerged; in particular, the values of detectability were lower during the first period for all species, even if the values never fall below 0.5 (Table 2). The occupancy probabilities ranged from 0.36 for S. lucumonis to 0.49 for T. muticellus. The probability of colonization are resumed for all species considered equal to about twice the probability of extinction, which fell within the range 0.10–0.13 (Table 3). Elevation and river fragmentation were key predictors of occupancy, colonization, extirpation and detection, as they were included in the best multi-season models, within two AIC units of the top model (Table S1). For S. lucumonis, estimated extinction probabilities decreased from low to high-elevation sites, while the occupancy probability progressively and linearly decreased from low to high-fragmentation degree sites (Figure 11a). For T. muticellus, the extinction probability decreased with elevation and progressively increased with the river fragmentation degree; the occupancy probability increased with elevation (Figure 11b). For P. nigricans, the colonization probability decreased with elevation (as well as occupancy probability) and river fragmentation degree (Figure 11c).

4. Discussion

The increasing water temperature over time and the clear decreasing trend of annual average flow rates provided some evidence that climate changes have induced direct effects on the watercourses in the study area, and consequently affected the freshwater fish inhabiting these environments. In particular, the increases in water temperature could be reasonably related to the spatial distribution shifts of the endemic S. lucumonis and T. muticellus, which tend to move further upstream in order to reach their thermal optimum [27,61]. Over the last 27 years, within a proven period of climate warming and decreasing flow rates, both species have shown significant range shifts to higher elevation resulting in a mean increase of 40.5 and 33.7 m for S. lucumonis and T. muticellus, respectively. These findings are consistent with the mean altitudinal range shifts (32.7 m) reported for 47 freshwater fish species in a previous study carried out on British inland waters under climate warming conditions [21]. By contrast, the absence of significant variations in water temperature in their occurring sites supported the hypothesis that the distribution shift along the longitudinal gradient of rivers allowed S. lucumonis and T. muticellus to remain within their thermal preferences; tracking thermal preferences has also been found in marine fish species, as reported by Nye et al. [62] for the Northeast USA fish stocks. Beside this, at the moment there is no evidence for a reduction in the distribution range for either species but on the contrary there is a slight increase in the number of sites where the species are present, compared to the first recording period. This result suggests that, at this stage, climate changes have not yet led to decreased population density and local extinction phenomena of these species adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Moving upstream, however, species are exposed to a greater risk of extinction, since the Apennines watercourses of modest dimensions could dry out in their upper stretches during drought seasons in particular [9].
Amongst climate-induced effects, the combination of drought, loss of habitat and river fragmentation can be considered strong threats for inland waters biodiversity [11,63]. Due to the considerable fragmentation of the hydrographic network in the Tiber river basin, the loss of flow occurring in drought periods can lead to the isolation of species with limited thermal tolerance who would move in search of more suitable habitat conditions. In this context, species characterized by poor vagility are more susceptible to extinction in comparison with those of greater dispersal ability [64]. This is the case of P. nigricans, a sedentary bottom-dwelling species characterized by limited vagility [65,66,67]. The species has not shown the ability to perform significant movements, probably also due to the numerous insurmountable weirs and dams located on the watercourses in the study area, which are hindering the species’ migration along the longitudinal gradient of the rivers. The future status of P. nigricans populations is of particular concern, as in the Tiber river basin the species is likely to remain trapped in environments where it must face the increase in temperature and other multiple anthropogenic stressors such as water pollution and the presence of the invasive P. bonelli. The significant increase in water temperature observed over time in the sites in which the species was present confirmed this hypothesis. However, except for the local extinction events that occurred as a result of unprecedented drought periods, which concern some sites within the Nestore River basin, for P. nigricans an overall increase over time of the total number of occurring sites also was observed and, as shown by the GLM analysis, a progressive increase in population density. These surprising results supported the hypothesis that in the short term, in some cases the fish species could benefit temporarily from increasing temperatures in terms of increased recruitment and did not show apparent changes in their distribution [7,62]. Certainly further research are needed to identify the thermal maxima tolerable by the species and to predict when it will be reached.
The multi-season models results suggested that S. lucumonis and T. muticellus extinction probabilities were highest at low-elevation sites, while for P. nigricans the major obstacle to the colonization of other sites seems to be represented by the river fragmentation, as well as by the altitude. As already reported in previous studies concerning salmonid fishes [68], also in our research the altitude seems to play a key role in the distribution of the species inhabiting the Tiber River basin, also in consideration of the close link between altitude, water temperature and presence of alien species. However, unlike the cold-water species, for which recent studies demonstrated significantly greater probability of extinction than the probability of colonization, and showed marked reductions in their range [68,69], in this case the opposite happens. This result seems to confirm the hypothesis that for the cool-water species the effects of climate change are starting to occur but it will take some time before the striking consequences could be highlighted.
Similarly to previous studies [28,45], our CCA demonstrates how the fish species are distributed along the longitudinal gradient of the watercourses and which are the environmental variables that most influence their distribution. As reported for other watersheds in the Mediterranean area [70], also in the Tiber River basin the longitudinal gradient was associated with a progressive decline in water quality, proceeding from upstream to downstream, demonstrated by the decrease of EBI and increased conductivity and concentration of dissolved salts. Beside this, recent studies carried out in the Tiber river basin [28,71] showed the presence of many invasive species, mainly located in lowland stream reaches and lakes [72,73]; these species are often limnophilous and can be favored by climate changes due to their wider ecological tolerance.
Due to the presence of the aforementioned multiple anthropogenic stressors, the results of studies on climate change effects should be interpreted with caution, because there are many variables to be considered in order to evaluate biological changes [64,74,75]. Moreover, synergistic effects that lead to an amplification of negative impacts on freshwater fishes can often occur [76]. These negative impacts can result in fish population-level changes [77]. S. lucumonis and T. muticellus resulted in good population status in terms of abundance and age structure, but not in terms of relative weight; probably the poor body conditions not made them able to adapt to the new environmental conditions and could represent the reason that pushes them to search for more suitable sites, adapting their distributions. For P. nigricans the unbalanced population structure, with the lack of young specimens, could represent a first sign of the state of uneasiness of the species.

5. Conclusions

The present research has shown fish distributional changes in a context of climate warming; these results, based on observational data, can be useful for planning future management scenarios [78], also in light of the fact that the climate models predict further strong impacts on freshwater fish [64]. In particular, the possible conservation strategies that can be suggested for fish biodiversity conservation under climate-induced impacts are: (i) the maintenance of ecological flow, whereas the natural variability of the flow rate is indispensable for the conservation of habitat suitable for the life of freshwater fishes [3]; (ii) the restoration of river connectivity in order to provide opportunity, to fish species with low thermal tolerance, to move towards thermal optimum considering, however, the possibility of maintaining barriers in the event of a need to prevent the rise of exotic species; (iii) the establishment of protection areas where total autochthonous assemblages are preserved and thus play a key role in maintaining biodiversity; (iv) improvement of water quality in polluted rivers is needed to reduce additional anthropogenic stressors for resilient fish populations to adapt to climate change; (v) the restoration of riparian areas to provide shade and have directly cooling effect on river temperature [79].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/11/2349/s1, Table S1: Models within two Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) units of the top model for estimating occupancy (ψ), colonization (g), extirpation (ε) and detection (p) probabilities for (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus, (c) Padogobius nigricans.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to conceptualization, methodology, statistical analysis, investigation and interpretation of data. All authors give approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks all the people who participated in the field activities to collect data for the Regional Fish Map of the Umbria Region and all the students and collaborators who joined the project. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments that considerably improved the original version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mack, R.N.; Simberloff, D.; Lonsdale, W.; Evans, M.H.; Clout, M.; Bazzaz, F.A. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 689–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cuttelod, A.; García, N.; Malak, D.A.; Temple, H.J.; Katariya, V. The Mediterranean: A biodiversity hotspot under threat. In Wildlife in a Changing World. An Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; Vié, J.C., Hilton-Taylor, C., Stuart, S.N., Eds.; Ingoprint: Barcelona, Spain, 2009; pp. 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudgeon, D.; Arthington, A.H.; Gessner, M.O.; Kawabata, Z.; Knowler, D.J.; Lévêque, C.; Naiman, R.J.; Prieur-Richard, A.H.; Soto, D.; Stiassny, M.L.J.; et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Myers, G.S. Freshwater fishes and East Indian zoogeography. Stanf. Ichtyol. Bull. 1951, 4, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Strayer, D.L.; Dudgeon, D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. J. North. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2010, 29, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Darwall, W.; Smith, K.; Allen, D.; Seddon, M.; McGregor, R.G.; Clausnitzer, V.; Kalkman, V. Freshwater biodiversity a hidden resource under threat. In Wildlife in a Changing World. An Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; Vié, J.C., Hilton-Taylor, C., Stuart, S.N., Eds.; Ingoprint: Barcelona, Spain, 2009; pp. 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  7. Comte, L.; Buisson, L.; Daufresne, M.; Grenouillet, G.L. Climate-induced changes in the distribution of freshwater fish: Observed and predicted trends. Freshw. Biol. 2013, 58, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Markovic, D.; Carrizo, S.; Freyhof, J.; Cid, N.; Lengyel, S.; Scholz, M.; Kasperdius, H.; Darwall, W. Europe’s freshwater biodiversity under climate change: Distribution shifts and conservation needs. Divers. Distrib. 2014, 20, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lorenzoni, M.; Barocco, R.; Carosi, A.; Giannetto, D.; Pompei, L. The fish fauna of the Apennine streams related to changes in the regime of wet depositions. Biol. Ambient. 2014, 28, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xenopoulos, M.A.; Lodge, D.M.; Alcamo, J.; Märker, M.; Schulze, K.; Van Vuuren, D.P. Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2005, 11, 1557–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Woodward, G.; Perkins, D.M.; Brown, L.E. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: Impacts cross multiple levels of organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Crozier, L.G.; Hutchings, J.A. Plastic and evolutionary responses to climate change in fish. Evol. Appl. 2014, 7, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chu, C.; Mandrak, N.E.; Minns, C.K. Potential impacts of climate change on the distributions of several common and rare freshwater fishes in Canada. Divers. Distrib. 2005, 11, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Foden, W.; Mace, G.; Vié, J.C.; Angulo, A.; Butchart, S.; De Vantier, L.; Dublin, H.; Gutsche, A.; Stuart, S.; Turak, E. Species susceptibility to climate change impacts. In The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; Vié, J.C., Hilton-Taylor, C., Stuart, S.N., Eds.; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pratchett, M.S.; Bay, L.K.; Gehrke, P.C.; Koehn, J.D.; Osborne, K.; Pressey, R.L.; Sweatman, H.P.A.; Wachenfeld, D. Contribution of climate change to degradation and loss of critical fish habitats in Australian marine and freshwater environments. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2011, 62, 1062–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Barnett, T.P.; Adam, J.C.; Lettenmaier, D.P. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 2005, 438, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bellard, C.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Leadley, P.; Thuiller, W.; Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Godinho, F.N.; Ferreira, M.T. Composition of endemic fish assemblages in relation to exotic species and river regulation in a temperate stream. Biol. Invasions 2000, 2, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pletterbauer, F.; Melcher, A.H.; Ferreira, T.; Schmutz, S. Impact of climate change on the structure of fish assemblages in European rivers. Hydrobiologia 2015, 744, 235–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hickling, R.; Roy, D.B.; Hill, J.K.; Fox, R.; Thomas, C.D. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Isaac, D.J.; Rieman, B.E. Stream isotherm shifts from climate change and implications for distributions of ectothermic organisms. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thomas, C.D.; Cameron, A.; Green, R.E.; Bakkenes, M.; Beaumont, L.J.; Collingham, Y.C.; Erasmus, B.F.N.; De Siqueira, M.F.; Grainger, A.; Hannah, L.; et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Visser, M.E. Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Santato, S.; Mysiak, J.; Pérez-Blanco, C.D. The Water Abstraction License Regime in Italy. A case for Reform? Water 2016, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. European Environment Agency (EEA). Water Quantity; EEA: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008; Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/92-9167-205-X/page013.html (accessed on 26 October 2019).
  27. Lorenzoni, M.; Mearelli, M.; Ghetti, L. Native and exotic fish species in the Tiber river watershed (Umbria—Italy) and their relationship to the longitudinal gradient. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 2006, 382, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Forconi, A.; Lorenzoni, M. Fish community of the river Tiber basin (Umbria—Italy): Temporal changes and possible threats to native biodiversity. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2015, 416, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giannetto, D.; Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Pedicillo, G.; Pompei, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Ecological traits of Squalius lucumonis (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) and main differences with those of Squalius squalus in the Tiber River Basin (Italy). Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2013, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kottelat, M.; Freyhof, J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes; Kottelat: Cornol, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  31. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2018-1. Available online: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 13 September 2018).
  32. Tirelli, T.; Pessani, D. Use of decision tree and artificial neural network approaches to model presence/absence of Telestes muticellus in Piedmont (north-western Italy). River Res. Appl. 2009, 25, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pompei, L.; Carosi, A.; Forconi, A.; Giannetto, D.; Lorenzoni, M. Distribution and abundance of Padogobius nigricans (Canestrini, 1867) and P. bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) in the river Tiber basin (Umbria, central Italy). Ital. J. Freshw. Ichthyol. 2016, 3, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pompei, L.; Giannetto, D.; Lorenzoni, M. Range expansion of an invasive goby in the River Tiber basin (Central Italy): Effects on the abundance and the shelter occupancy of a congeneric native goby. Aquat. Invasions 2018, 13, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lorenzoni, M.; Carosi, A.; Giovinazzo, G.; Mearelli, M. Presence and distribution of non-native fish species in the Tiber river basin, from the sources to the confluence with the Nera River. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. 1997, 137, 47–63. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moran, P.A.P. A mathematical theory of animal trapping. Biometrika 1951, 38, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zippin, C. An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 1956, 12, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seber, G.A.F.; Le Cren, E.D. Estimating population parameters from catches larges relative to the population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1967, 36, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Lyons, J.; Rasmussen, P.; Seelbach, P.; Simon, T.; Wiley, M.; Kanehl, P.; Baker, E.; Scott, N.; Stewart, P.M. Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003, 60, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smith, T.A.; Kraft, C.E. Stream fish assemblages in relation to landscape position and local habitat variables. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2005, 134, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i servizi Tecnici (APAT); Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR); Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque (IRSA). Analytical Methods for Water. Manuals and Guidelines. 2003. Available online: http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-linee-guida/metodi-analitici-per-le-acque (accessed on 26 October 2019).
  42. American Public Health Association (APHA); American Waters Works Association (AWWA); Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; Clesceri, L.S., Greenberg, A.E., Eaton, A.D., Eds.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  43. American Public Health Association (APHA); American Waters Works Association (AWWA); Water pollution Control Federation (WPCF). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed.; Greenberg, A.E., Clesceri, L.S., Eaton, A.D., Eds.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ghetti, P.F. I Macroinvertebrati Nell’analisi di Qualità dei Corsi D’acqua; Bertelli: Trento, Italy, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  45. Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Status of Pseudorasbora parva in the Tiber River Basin (Umbria, central Italy) 20 years after its introduction. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2016, 417, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Murphy, B.R.; Brown, M.L.; Springer, T.A. Evaluation of the relative weight (Wr) index, with new applications to walleye. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1990, 10, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blackwell, B.G.; Brown, M.L.; Willis, D.W. Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2000, 8, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brown, M.L.; Murphy, B.R. Relationship of relative weight (Wr) to proximate composition of juvenile striped bass and hybrid striped bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1991, 120, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Angeli, V.; Bicchi, A.; Carosi, A.; Pedicillo, G.; Spigonardi, M.P.; Lorenzoni, M. Calculation of standard weight (Ws) for the main fish species in the Tiber basin. Stud. Trent. Sci. Nat. 2010, 87, 141–143. [Google Scholar]
  50. Giannetto, D.; Carosi, A.; Franchi, E.; Pedicillo, G.; Pompei, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Proposed standard weight (Ws) equations for Telestes muticellus (Bonaparte, 1837) in the Tiber River basin. Cybium 2011, 35, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  51. Le Cren, E.D. The length relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol. 1951, 20, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ricker, W.E. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1975, 191, 1–382. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gabelhouse, D.W., Jr. A length-categorization system to assess fish stocks. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1984, 4, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pedicillo, G.; Lorenzoni, M.; Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L. Application of Stock Density Indices as a tool for broad-scale population assessment for four cyprinid species in Central Italy. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2013, 33, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gassner, H.; Tischler, G.; Wanzenböck, J. Ecological integrity assessment of lakes using fish communities-suggestion of new metrics developed in two Austrian prealpine lakes. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2003, 88, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ter Braak, C.J.F. Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986, 67, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lepš, J.; Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data; University of South Bohemia: Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  58. Brown, M.L.; Austen, D.J. Data management and statistical techniques. In Fisheries Techniques; Murphy, B.R., Willis, D.W., Eds.; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1996; pp. 17–61. [Google Scholar]
  59. Burnham, K.P.; Anderson, D.R. Model Selection and Inference: An Information-Theoretic Approach; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  60. Burnham, K.P.; Anderson, D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  61. Franchi, E.; Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Pompei, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Changes in the fish community of the upper Tiber River after construction of a hydro-dam. J. Limnol. 2014, 73, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nye, J.A.; Link, J.S.; Hare, J.A.; Overholtz, W.J. Changing spatial distribution of fish stocks in relation to climate and population size on the Northeast United States continental shelf. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 393, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lake, P.S. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 48, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Heino, J.; Erkinaro, J.; Huusko, A.; Luoto, M. Climate change effects on freshwater fishes conservation and management. In Conservation of Freshwater Fishes; Closs, G.P., Krkosek, M., Olden, J.D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 77–106. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pirisinu, Q.; Natali, M. Gobius nigricans Canestrini (Peisces, Osteichtyes, Gobiidae) endemic species of central Italy. Riv. Idrobiol. 1980, 19, 593–614. [Google Scholar]
  66. Gandolfi, G.; Zerunian, S.; Torricelli, P.; Marconato, A. The Fish of Italian Inland Waters; Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato: Rome, Italy, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  67. Carosi, A.; Mearelli, M.; Giovinazzo, G.; Petesse, M.L.; Lorenzoni, M. Distribution and ecology of the Arno goby (Padogobius nigricans Canestrini) in the river Tiber basin. In Proceedings of the VI AIIAD National Congress, Varese Ligure, Italy, 6–8 June 1996; pp. 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  68. Eby, L.A.; Helmy, O.; Holsinger, L.M.; Young, M.K. Evidence of Climate-Induced Range Contractions in Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus in a Rocky Mountain Watershed, USA. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wenger, S.J.; Isaak, D.J.; Luce, C.H.; Neville, H.M.; Fausch, K.D.; Dunham, J.B.; Dauwalter, D.C.; Young, M.K.; Elsner, M.M.; Rieman, B.E.; et al. Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14175–14180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Vila-Gispert, A.; García-Berthou, E.; Moreno-Amich, R. Fish zonation in a Mediterranean stream: Effects of human disturbances. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 64, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Cauzillo, C.; Pompei, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Occurrence and distribution of exotic fishes in the Tiber River basin (Umbria, central Italy). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2017, 33, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Lorenzoni, M.; Pace, R.; Pedicillo, G.; Viali, P.; Carosi, A. Growth, catches and reproductive biology of ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus in Lake Piediluco (Umbria, Italy). Folia Zool. Brno 2009, 58, 420–435. [Google Scholar]
  73. Carosi, A.; Ghetti, L.; Padula, R.; Lorenzoni, M. Potential effects of global climate change on fisheries in the Trasimeno Lake (Italy), with special reference to the goldfish Carassius auratus invasion and the endemic southern pike Esox cisalpinus decline. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Parmesan, C.; Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Guisan, A.; Thuiller, W. Predicting Species Distribution: Offering more than a simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 993–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rahel, F.J.; Olden, J.D. Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Power, M. Assessing the effects of environmental stressors on fish populations. Aquat. Toxicol. 1997, 39, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Franceschini, S.; Gandola, E.; Martinoli, M.; Tancioni, L.; Scardi, M. Cascaded neural networks improving fish species prediction accuracy: The role of the biotic information. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kalny, G.; Laaha, G.; Melcher, A.; Trimmel, H.; Weihs, P.; Rauch, H.P. The influence of riparian vegetation shading on water temperature during low flow conditions in a medium sized river. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2017, 418, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area and location of the sampling sites.
Figure 1. Study area and location of the sampling sites.
Water 11 02349 g001
Figure 2. Trend over time of water temperature for 3 automatic monitoring stations: Clitunno River 1 (a), Topino River 2 (b), Tiber River 3 (c). Time periods: 2006–2015 for Clitunno River; 2006–2015 for Topino and Tiber Rivers.
Figure 2. Trend over time of water temperature for 3 automatic monitoring stations: Clitunno River 1 (a), Topino River 2 (b), Tiber River 3 (c). Time periods: 2006–2015 for Clitunno River; 2006–2015 for Topino and Tiber Rivers.
Water 11 02349 g002
Figure 3. Trend over time of the annual average flow rate for 5 hydrometric sites: Chiani River 1, Topino River 1, Tiber River 1, 2, 3. Time periods: (a,b) 1992–2016; (ce), 1920–2016. Solid lines represent the linear regressions. Dashed lines represent the regression bands with 0.95 confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Trend over time of the annual average flow rate for 5 hydrometric sites: Chiani River 1, Topino River 1, Tiber River 1, 2, 3. Time periods: (a,b) 1992–2016; (ce), 1920–2016. Solid lines represent the linear regressions. Dashed lines represent the regression bands with 0.95 confidence intervals.
Water 11 02349 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of the distribution and population abundances between the periods 1990–1997 (black circles) and 2012–2017 (grey circles) for: (a) Squalius lucumonis; (b) Telestes muticellus; (c) Padogobius nigricans.
Figure 4. Comparison of the distribution and population abundances between the periods 1990–1997 (black circles) and 2012–2017 (grey circles) for: (a) Squalius lucumonis; (b) Telestes muticellus; (c) Padogobius nigricans.
Water 11 02349 g004
Figure 5. Occupancy-elevation plots showing occupied (filled circles) and unoccupied (clear circles) sites for each time period for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans. Solid lines represent the linear regressions.
Figure 5. Occupancy-elevation plots showing occupied (filled circles) and unoccupied (clear circles) sites for each time period for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans. Solid lines represent the linear regressions.
Water 11 02349 g005
Figure 6. Trend over time of the mean altitude values for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans considering only the occurring sites in the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017.
Figure 6. Trend over time of the mean altitude values for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans considering only the occurring sites in the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017.
Water 11 02349 g006
Figure 7. Canonical Correspondence Analysis results: biplot of fish and environmental variables for the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Black stars denote centroids of the periods 1990–1996 and 2010–2017, calculated as average scores of the samples belonging to those years.
Figure 7. Canonical Correspondence Analysis results: biplot of fish and environmental variables for the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Black stars denote centroids of the periods 1990–1996 and 2010–2017, calculated as average scores of the samples belonging to those years.
Water 11 02349 g007
Figure 8. The effects of altitude on the abundance of (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans over the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Solid lines indicate significant results from the general linear model (GLM).
Figure 8. The effects of altitude on the abundance of (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans over the census periods 1990–1997, 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Solid lines indicate significant results from the general linear model (GLM).
Water 11 02349 g008
Figure 9. Weirs and dams’ locations in the study area.
Figure 9. Weirs and dams’ locations in the study area.
Water 11 02349 g009
Figure 10. Trend over time of the mean density, relative weight (Wr), and proportional stock density (PSD) values for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans, for the sampling periods 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. Note the different Kn scale values compared to Wr.
Figure 10. Trend over time of the mean density, relative weight (Wr), and proportional stock density (PSD) values for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans, for the sampling periods 1998–2004, 2005–2011, 2012–2017. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. Note the different Kn scale values compared to Wr.
Water 11 02349 g010
Figure 11. Effects of elevation and degree of river fragmentation on occupancy, colonization and extinction probabilities from the best informative models for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans.
Figure 11. Effects of elevation and degree of river fragmentation on occupancy, colonization and extinction probabilities from the best informative models for: (a) Squalius lucumonis, (b) Telestes muticellus and (c) Padogobius nigricans.
Water 11 02349 g011
Table 1. Canonical and correlation coefficients of environmental variables with axis. p < 0.05 is in bold.
Table 1. Canonical and correlation coefficients of environmental variables with axis. p < 0.05 is in bold.
Environmental ParametersAX1pAX2p
Altitude (m a.s.l.)0.8020.000−0.2250.000
Average current speed (m s−1)0.1830.002−0.3360.000
Cl (mg L−1)−0.7190.0000.4770.000
Conductivity (S cm−1)−0.7380.0000.3990.000
Dissolved oxygen (mg L−1)0.1930.001−0.0040.943
Distance from the source (km)−0.6520.000−0.5440.000
EBI (units)0.5370.000−0.1110.061
EBI Quality Class (units)−0.6060.0000.1110.062
Flow rate (m3 s−1)−0.1350.023−0.6190.000
NNH3 (mg L−1)−0.3170.0000.0210.728
pH (units)−0.0130.8260.1150.052
PPO4 (mg L−1)−0.2590.0000.1220.040
River fragmentation degree (units)0.1560.008−0.4000.000
SO4 (mg L−1)−0.5930.0000.1270.033
Water temperature (°C)−0.2490.000−0.0970.104
Watershed area (km−2)−0.5470.000−0.7000.000
Table 2. Overall occupancy (ψ), colonization (ɣ), extirpation (ε) and detection (p) probabilities (±SE) for Squalius lucumonis, Telestes muticellus and Padogobius nigricans.
Table 2. Overall occupancy (ψ), colonization (ɣ), extirpation (ε) and detection (p) probabilities (±SE) for Squalius lucumonis, Telestes muticellus and Padogobius nigricans.
SpeciesOccupancy (ψ)Colonization (ɣ)Extirpation (ε)Detection (p)
S. Lucumonis0.36 ± 0.060.22 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.060.74 ± 0.04
T. Muticellus0.49 ± 0.060.28 ± 0.080.13 ± 0.050.75 ± 0.03
P. Nigricans0.40 ± 0.060.21 ± 0.070.10 ± 0.030.79 ± 0.03
Table 3. Probability of detection (± standard error (SE)) across the four time periods for Squalius lucumonis, Telestes muticellus and Padogobius nigricans.
Table 3. Probability of detection (± standard error (SE)) across the four time periods for Squalius lucumonis, Telestes muticellus and Padogobius nigricans.
SpeciesDetection Probability
Time Period 1Time Period 2Time Period 3Time Period 4
1990–19971998–20042005–20102011–2017
S. Lucumonis0.57 ± 0.010.82 ± 0.050.76 ± 0.060.65 ± 0.07
T. Muticellus0.64 ± 0.010.75 ± 0.050.69 ± 0.060.81 ± 0.05
P. Nigricans0.61 ± 0.010.73 ± 0.060.78 ± 0.050.86 ± 0.05

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carosi, A.; Padula, R.; Ghetti, L.; Lorenzoni, M. Endemic Freshwater Fish Range Shifts Related to Global Climate Changes: A Long-Term Study Provides Some Observational Evidence for the Mediterranean Area. Water 2019, 11, 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112349

AMA Style

Carosi A, Padula R, Ghetti L, Lorenzoni M. Endemic Freshwater Fish Range Shifts Related to Global Climate Changes: A Long-Term Study Provides Some Observational Evidence for the Mediterranean Area. Water. 2019; 11(11):2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carosi, Antonella, Rosalba Padula, Lucia Ghetti, and Massimo Lorenzoni. 2019. "Endemic Freshwater Fish Range Shifts Related to Global Climate Changes: A Long-Term Study Provides Some Observational Evidence for the Mediterranean Area" Water 11, no. 11: 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop