Social and Economic Aspects of Water Use in Specialty Crop Production in the USA: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Consumer and Grower Perceptions
3. Life Cycle Assessment and Water Footprint Analysis
4. Economic Considerations
5. Regulations and Policy Considerations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Châtel, F. Perceptions of Water in the Middle East: The Role of Religion, Politics and Technology in Concealing the Growing Water Scarcity. In Water Resources in the Middle East: Israel-Palestinian Water Issues—From Conflict to Cooperation; Shuval, H., Dweik, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attari, S.Z. Perceptions of water use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5129–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Falkenmark, M.; Rockström, J. The New Blue and Green Water Paradigm: Breaking New Ground for Water Resources Planning and Management. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2006, 132, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera-Klink, F.; Pérez-Moriana, E.; Sánchez-García, J. The social construction of scarcity. The case of water in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petra, D. Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: A global-scale assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 035006. [Google Scholar]
- Wada, Y.; van Beek, L.P.H.; van Kempen, C.M.; Reckman, J.W.T.M.; Vasak, S.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jenkins, M.W.; Lund, J.R.; Howitt, R.E. Using Economic Loss Functions to Value urban water scarcity in California. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2003, 95, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmond, J.A.; Tadaki, M.; Vardoulakis, S.; Arbuthnott, K.; Coutts, A.; Demuzere, M.; Dirks, K.N.; Heaviside, C.; Lim, S.; Macintyre, H.; et al. Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environ. Health 2016, 15 (Suppl. 1), S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bringslimark, T.; Hartig, T.; Patil, G.G. Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into Context. HortScience 2007, 42, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, F.; Bao, Z.Y.; Zhu, Z.J. An assessment of psychological noise reduction by landscape plants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 1032–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A.; Öhrström, E. Attractive ”quiet” courtyards: A potential modifier of urban residents’ responses to road traffic noise? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3359–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamm, A.J.; Warner, L.A.; Martin, E.T.; White, S.A.; Fisher, P. Enhancing extension programs by discussing water conservation technology adoption with growers. J. Agric. Educ. 2017, 58, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamm, A.J.; Warner, L.A.; Taylor, M.R.; Martin, E.T.; White, S.A.; Fisher, P. Diffusing Water Conservation and Treatment Technologies to Nursery and Greenhouse Growers. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Educ. 2017, 24, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmus, A.; Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamm, A.J.; Warner, L.A.; Lundy, L.K.; Bommidi, J.S.; Beattie, P.N. Informing water-saving communication in the United States using the situational theory of problem solving. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 180, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, L.A.; Lamm, A.J.; Beattie, P.; White, S.A.; Fisher, P.R. Identifying Opportunities to Promote Water Conservation Practices among Nursery and Greenhouse Growers. HortScience 2018, 53, 958–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lamm, A.; Warner, L.; Taylor, M.; Martin, E.; White, S.; Fisher, P. Diffusing water conservation and treatment technologies to nursery and greenhouse growers. J. Intl. Agr. Ext. Educ. 2017, 24, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennis, J.; Lopez, R.; Behe, B.; Hall, C.; Yue, C.; Campbell, B. Sustainable production practices adopted by greenhouse and nursery plant growers. HortScience 2010, 45, 1232–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, T.J.; Dennis, J.H.; Lopez, R.G.; Marshall, M.I. Factors affecting growers’ willingness to adopt sustainable floriculture practices. HortScience 2009, 44, 1346–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behe, B.K.; Campbell, B.L.; Hall, C.R.; Khachatryan, H.; Dennis, J.H.; Yue, C. Consumer preferences for local and sustainable plant production characteristics. HortScience 2012, 48, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khachatryan, H.; Campbell, B.; Hall, C.; Behe, B.; Yue, C.; Dennis, J. The effects of individual environmental concerns on willingness to pay for sustainable plant attributes. HortScience 2014, 49, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knuth, M.; Behe, B.K.; Hall, C.R.; Huddleston, P.T.; Fernandez, R.T. Consumer Perceptions, Attitudes, and Purchase Behavior with Landscape Plants during Real and Perceived Drought Periods. HortScience 2018, 53, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knuth, M.; Behe, B.K.; Hall, C.R.; Huddleston, P.; Fernandez, R.T. Consumer Perceptions of Landscape Plant Production Water Sources and Uses in the Landscape during Perceived and Real Drought. HortTechnology 2018, 28, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behe, B.K.; Knuth, M.; Hall, C.R.; Huddleston, P.T.; Fernandez, R.T. Consumer Involvement with and Expertise in Water Conservation and Plants Affect Landscape Plant Purchases, Importance, and Enjoyment. HortScience 2018, 53, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McClaran, N.; Behe, B.K.; Huddleston, P.T.; Fernandez, R.T. Removing the yuck out of recycled water: The effect of water source and name. J. Risk Manag. 2019. in review. [Google Scholar]
- McClaran, N.; Behe, B.K.; Huddleston, P. Ignorance is not use or bliss: The case for recycled water. HortScience. in preparation.
- Baumann, H.; Tillman, A.-M. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application; Studentlitteratur: Lund, Sweden, 2004; p. 543. [Google Scholar]
- Bare, J.C.; Norris, G.A.; Pennington, D.W.; McKone, T. TRACI—The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J. Ind. Ecol. 2003, 6, 49–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practices; EPA/600/R-06/060; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Wasthington, DC, USA, 2006; p. 80.
- Laurent, A.; Olsen, S.I.; Hauschild, M.Z. Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4100–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, G.; Ridoutt, B.; Bellotti, B. Carbon and water footprint tradeoffs in fresh tomato production. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 32, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingram, D.L.; Hall, C.R. Life Cycle Assessment used to determine potential midpoint environment impact factors and water footprint of field-grown tree production inputs and processes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2015, 140, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingram, D.L.; Hall, C.R.; Knight, J. Carbon Footprint and Variable Costs of Production Components for a Container-grown Evergreen Shrub Using Life Cycle Assessment: An East Coast U.S. Model. HortScience 2016, 51, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ingram, D.L. Life cycle assessment of a field-grown red maple tree to estimate its carbon footprint components. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2012, 17, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingram, D.L.; Hall, C.R. Carbon Footprint and Related Production Costs of System Components of a Field-Grown Cercis canadensis L. ‘Forest Pansy’ Using Life Cycle Assessment. J. Environ. Hortic. 2013, 31, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoekstra, A.Y.; Mekonnen, M.M.; Chapagain, A.K.; Mathews, R.E.; Richter, B.D. Global Monthly Water Scarcity: Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perry, C. Efficient irrigation, inefficienct communication; flawed recommendations. Irrig. Drain. 2007, 56, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiklomanov, I.A. Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int. 2000, 25, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and gray water footprint of wheat. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 1259–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcamo, J.; Henrichs, T.; Rosch. World Water in 2025: Global Modeling and Scenario Analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century; Kassel World Water Series, Report No. 2. Kassel, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Smakthin, V.; Revenga, C.; Doll, P. Taking into account environmental water requirements in global-scale water resources assessments. In Comprehensive Assessment Water Resource Report 2; International Water Management Institute: Battaramulla, Sri Lanka, 2004; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
- Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. The green, blue and gray water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 15, 1577–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfister, S.; Koehler, A.; Hellweg, S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4098–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulay, A.-M.; Bulle, C.; Bayart, J.-B.; Deschenes, L.; Margni, M. Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: Modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8948–8957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulay, A.-M.; Bare, J.; Benini, L.; Berger, M.; Lathuillière, M.J.; Manzardo, A.; Margni, M.; Motoshita, M.; Núñez, M.; Pastor, A.V.; et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: Assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, J.; Ingram, D.L.; Hall, C.R. Workshop: Understanding Irrigation Water Applied, Consumptive Water Use, and Water Footprint Using Case Studies for Container Nursery Production and Greenhouse Crops. HortTechnology 2019, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chappell, M.; Dove, S.K.; van Iersel, M.W.; Thomas, P.A.; Ruter, J. Implementation of Wireless Sensor Networks for Irrigation Control in Three Container Nurseries. HortTechnology 2013, 23, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saavoss, M.; Majsztrik, J.; Belayneh, B.; Lea-Cox, J.; Lichtenberg, E. Yield, quality and profitability of sensor-controlled irrigation: A case study of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) production. Irrig. Sci. 2016, 34, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lea-Cox, J.D.; Bauerle, W.L.; van Iersel, M.W.; Kantor, G.F.; Bauerle, T.L.; Lichtenberg, E.; King, D.M.; Crawford, L. Advancing Wireless Sensor Networks for Irrigation Management of Ornamental Crops: An Overview. HortTechnology 2013, 23, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Belayneh, B.E.; Lea-Cox, J.D.; Lichtenberg, E. Costs and Benefits of Implementing Sensor-controlled Irrigation in a Commercial Pot-in-Pot Container Nursery. HortTechnology 2013, 23, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lichtenberg, E.; Majsztrik, J.; Saavoss, M. Grower demand for sensor-controlled irrigation. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 51, 341–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belayneh, B.; Lea-Cox, J. Using sensor networks to maximize irrigation water use efficiency in strawberry production. In Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 1150, Lleida, Spain, 8–11 June 2015; pp. 399–406. [Google Scholar]
- White, S.A.; James, S.; Owen, J.; Majsztrik, J.C.; Oki, L.R.; Fisher, P.R.; Hall, C.R.; Lea-Cox, J.D.; Fernandez, R.T. Greenhouse and Nursery Water Management Characterization and Research Priorities in the USA. Water 2019. in review. [Google Scholar]
- Majsztrik, J.C.; Ristvey, A.G.; Lea-Cox, J.D. Water and nutrient management in the production of container-grown ornamentals. Hortic. Rev. 2011, 38, 253–297. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, A.T. Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict. Nat. Resour. Forum 1999, 23, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Water Webster. Florida, Alabama, and Georgia Water Sharing. Available online: http://www.waterwebster.org/FloridaAlabamaGeorgia.htm (accessed on 17 October 2015).
- Blue, C.O. North vs. South—Carolina States Settle Water Dispute Without Supreme Court. Available online: http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2011/world/north-vs-south%E2%80%94carolina-states-settle-water-dispute-without-supreme-court/ (accessed on 22 October 2015).
- Scholz, J.T.; Stiftel, B. Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning; Routledge: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Majsztrik, J.; Lea-Cox, J.D. Water quality regulations in the Chesapeake Bay: Working to more precisely estimate nutrient loading rates and incentivize best management practices in the nursery and greenhouse industry. HortScience 2013, 48, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Impaired Waters and TMDL’s. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/tmdl (accessed on 5 September 2019).
- Majsztrik, J.C.; Fernandez, R.T.; Fisher, P.R.; Hitchcock, D.R.; Lea-Cox, J.; Owen, J.S.; Oki, L.R.; White, S.A. Water Use and Treatment in Container-Grown Specialty Crop Production: A Review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
- Walther, G.-R.; Post, E.; Convey, P.; Menzel, A.; Parmesan, C.; Beebee, T.J.C.; Fromentin, J.-M.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Bairlein, F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Howden, S.M.; Soussana, J.-F.; Tubiello, F.N.; Chhetri, N.; Dunlop, M.; Meinke, H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19691–19696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bilderback, T.; Boyer, C.; Chappell, M.; Fain, G.; Fare, D.; Gilliam, C.; Jackson, B.; Lea-Cox, J.; LeBude, A.; Niemiera, A.; et al. Best Management Practices: Guide for Producing Nursery Crops, 3rd ed.; Southern Nursery Association: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013; Available online: http://contents.sna.org/bmpv30.html (accessed on 2 November 2015).
- Beeson, R.C., Jr.; Arnold, M.A.; Bilderback, T.E.; Bolusky, B.; Chandler, S.; Gramling, H.M.; Lea-Cox, J.D.; Harris, J.R.; Klinger, P.J.; Mathers, H.M.; et al. Strategic vision of container nursery irrigation in the next ten years. J. Environ. Hortic. 2004, 22, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
- White, S.A. Wetland Technologies for Nursery and Greenhouse Compliance with Nutrient Regulations. HortScience 2013, 48, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metcalf and Eddy, Inc.; Asano, T.; Burton, F.L.; Leverenz, H.; Tsuchihashi, R.; Tchobanoglous, G. Water Reuse; McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.; Lu, S.; Jiao, W.; Wang, M.; Chang, A.C. Reclaimed water: A safe irrigation water source? Environ. Dev. 2013, 8, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hering, J.G.; Waite, T.D.; Luthy, R.G.; Drewes, J.E.; Sedlak, D.L. A Changing Framework for Urban Water Systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10721–10726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; Wintgens, T.; Ravazzini, A.; Miska, V.; Muston, M.; Chikurel, H.; Aharoni, A.; Joksimovic, D.; Melin, T. Water reclamation and reuse: Implementation and management issues. Desalination 2008, 218, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández, F.; Urkiaga, A.; De las Fuentes, L.; Bis, B.; Chiru, E.; Balazs, B.; Wintgens, T. Feasibility studies for water reuse projects: An economical approach. Desalination 2006, 187, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karagiannis, I.C.; Soldatos, P.G. Water desalination cost literature: Review and assessment. Desalination 2008, 223, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younos, T. The Economics of Desalination. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 2005, 132, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Karaghouli, A.; Kazmerski, L.L. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 24, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2017 Census of Agriculture; AC-17-A-51; National Agricultrual Statistics Service, 2019.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Majsztrik, J.C.; Behe, B.; Hall, C.R.; Ingram, D.L.; Lamm, A.J.; Warner, L.A.; White, S.A. Social and Economic Aspects of Water Use in Specialty Crop Production in the USA: A Review. Water 2019, 11, 2337. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112337
Majsztrik JC, Behe B, Hall CR, Ingram DL, Lamm AJ, Warner LA, White SA. Social and Economic Aspects of Water Use in Specialty Crop Production in the USA: A Review. Water. 2019; 11(11):2337. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112337
Chicago/Turabian StyleMajsztrik, John C., Bridget Behe, Charles R. Hall, Dewayne L. Ingram, Alexa J. Lamm, Laura A. Warner, and Sarah A. White. 2019. "Social and Economic Aspects of Water Use in Specialty Crop Production in the USA: A Review" Water 11, no. 11: 2337. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112337