- Author
-
L.S. Bertels
- Title
- I just don’t think I have cancer
- Subtitle
- Why some participants do not follow up with a recommended colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening
- Supervisors
-
H.C.P.M. van Weert
E. Dekker - Co-supervisors
-
B.J. Knottnerus
K.M. van Asselt - Award date
- 24 June 2021
- Number of pages
- 149
- ISBN
- 9789464213355
- Document type
- PhD thesis
- Faculty
- Faculty of Medicine (AMC-UvA)
- Abstract
-
Participants who receive an unfavourable screening result in two-step colorectal cancer screening programmes have a significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer. They are therefore recommended a colonoscopy to examine the colon for the presence of cancer or a precursor to cancer. However, non-follow up of colonoscopy is an issue in almost all invitation based colorectal cancer-screening programmes. This thesis aimed to find out why some participants in the Dutch colorectal cancer-screening programme do not undergo colonoscopy after an unfavourable screening result. Methods used were interviews and a nation-wide questionnaire.
Results showed that participants who did not undergo colonoscopy more often feel their risk for colorectal cancer is low; more often have difficulties deciding, and have lower knowledge levels than those who do undergo colonoscopy. A negative colonoscopy advice from someone outside of the medical setting as well as referral to an unfamiliar colonoscopy location were also associated with non-follow up. Participants who do undergo colonoscopy more often believe their general practitioner is supportive of this examination. One third of participants who underwent the recommended colonoscopy (with a favourable outcome) reported high levels of cancer worry.
This thesis theorizes that participation in two-step cancer screening may be viewed as a two-step decision by invitees, and that feelings of moral obligation may lead to participation that is less informed than prescribed by the rational choice model. As such, placing emphasis on colorectal cancer screening participation as a 1-step decision and offering guidance to those with decisional difficulties may offer opportunities for further improvement of population based colorectal cancer screening. - Persistent Identifier
- https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/cd60a6ba-118a-4821-9838-a8ef62d9e033
- Downloads
-
Thesis (complete)
Front matter
Chapter 1: General introduction
Chapter 2: Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: A qualitative study
Chapter 3: Decision-making in CRC screening positive participants who follow up with colonoscopy: A mixed method study
Chapter 4: GPs’ perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: An exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context
Chapter 5: Reasons for no colonoscopy after positive FIT in Dutch colorectal cancer-screening programme: Nation-wide questionnaire
Chapter 6: Qualitative approaches can strengthen generalization and application of clinical research
Chapter 7: General discussion
Summary
Samenvatting
PhD portfolio; Dankwoord; About the author
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.