Normative Paradoxes of Privacy: Literacy and Choice in Platform Societies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Privacy scholars, advocates, and activists repeatedly emphasize the fact that current measures of privacy protection are insufficient to counter the systemic threats presented by datafication and platformization (van Dijck, de Waal, and Poell 2018: 24). These threats include discrimination against underprivileged groups, monopolization of power and knowledge, as well as manipulation. In this paper, we take that analysis one step further, suggesting that the consequences of inappropriate privacy protection online possibly even run counter to the normative principles that underpinned the standard clause for privacy protection in the first place. We discuss the ways in which attempts at protection run the risk of producing results that not only diverge from but, paradoxically, even distort the normative goals they intended to reach: informational self-determination, empowerment, and personal autonomy. Drawing on the framework of “normative paradoxes,” we argue that the ideals of a normatively increasingly one-sided, liberal individualism create complicities with the structural dynamics of platform capitalism, which in turn promote those material-discursive practices of digital usage that are ultimately extremely privacy-invasive.
Article Details
Surveillance & Society uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
- The author. The author licenses the article to the Surveillance Studies Network (SSN) for inclusion in Surveillance & Society (S&S), right of first publication. The copyright to the article remains with the author and any subsequent commercial reuse must be agreed by both parties.
- Non-commercial Users. SSN authorises all persons to use material published in S&S in any manner that is not primarily intended for or directed to commerical advantage or private monetary compensation, also provided that it is not modified and retains all attribution notices.
- Commercial Users. SSN retains the right to benefit from commerical reuse, in each specific case subject to the agreement of the author, and payment to SSN of a standard per-page fee (set by a vote of the Network and Editorial Board) by the Commercial User.
- Surveillance & Society supports open access archives and the free distribution of the results of academic work. Authors are encouraged to place copies of the final published version of their article in their university and / or other open access archives. We only ask that you make sure to include a link to the original published version on the Surveillance & Society website.
References
Altman, Irwin. 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Bakos, Yanis, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, and David Trossen. 2014. Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Testing a Law and Economics Approach to Standard Form Contracts. Journal of Legal Studies 43 (1).
Barocas, Solon, and Karen Levy. 2018. Refractive Surveillance: Monitoring Customers to Manage Workers. International Journal of Communication 12: 1166–88.
Barocas, Solon, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement, edited by Julia Lane, Victoria Stodden, Stefan Bender, and Helen Nissenbaum, 44–75. New York, NY: Boulder.
Bennett, Colin. 2014. The Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bird, Sarah, Solon Barocas, Kate Crawford, Fernando Diaz, and Hanna Wallach. 2016. Exploring or Exploiting? Social and Ethical Implications of Autonomous Experimentation in AI. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning, workshop. New York, NY: New York University Press.
boyd, danah. 2018. You Think You Want Media Literacy… Do You? Data & Society: Points, March 9. https://points.datasociety.net/you-think-you-want-media-literacy-do-you-7cad6af18ec2 [accessed January 20, 2019].
boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society 15 (5): 662–79.
boyd, danah, and Alice Marwick. 2014. Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social media. New Media & Society 16 (7): 1051–67.
boyd, danah, Karen Levy, and Alice Marwick. 2014. The Networked Nature of Algorithmic Discrimination. In Data & Discrimination: Collected Essays, edited by Seeta P. Gangadharan and Virginia Eubanks, 43–57. Washington, DC: Open Technology Institute.
Bridges, Khiara. 2018. The Poverty of Privacy Rights. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Busch, Andreas 2015. Privacy, Technology, and Regulation: Why One Size is Unlikely to Fit All. In Social Dimensions of Privacy – Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Beate Rössler and Dorota Mokrosinska, 303–323. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, Robyn, Joan Donovan, Lauren Hanson, and Joana Matthews. 2018. Algorithmic Accountability: A Primer. Data & Society, April 18. https://datasociety.net/output/algorithmic-accountability-a-primer/ [accessed December 20, 2018].
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
———. 1997. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Volume 2: The Power of Identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
———. 1998. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Volume 3: End of Millennium. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
———. 2008. The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 78–93.
Cate, Fred H., and Victor Mayer-Schönberger. 2013. Notice and Consent in a World of Big Data. International Data Privacy Law 3 (2): 67–73.
Cohen, Julie. 2008. Privacy, Visibility, Transparency, and Exposure. University of Chicago Law Review 75: 181–201.
———. 2012. Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code and the Play of Everyday Practice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Coleman, Gabriella. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. New York, NY: Verso Books.
Dalton, Craig M., Linnet Taylor, and Jim Thatcher. 2016. Critical Data Studies: A Dialog on Data and Space. Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–9.
Dencik, Lina, Arne Hintz, and Jonathan Cable. 2016. Towards Data Justice? The Ambiguity of Anti-Surveillance Resistance in Political Activism. Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1–12.
Diakopoulos, Nick. 2016. Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making. Communications of the ACM 59 (2): 56–62.
Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2020. Anonymity. https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity [accessed May 7, 2020].
Eshet-Alkalai, Yoram. 2004. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia 13 (1): 93–106.
Etzioni, Amitai. 1999. The Limits of Privacy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
European Commission. 2016. Data Protection in the EU. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_en [accessed May 7, 2020].
Facebook. n.d. Privacy Basics. https://www.facebook.com/about/basics [accessed May 7, 2020].
Federal Trade Commission. 2012. FTC Issues Final Commission Report on Protecting Consumer Privacy: Agency Calls on Companies to Adopt Best Privacy Practices. The Federal Trade Commission, March 26. https://perma.cc/7PM6-ZV6K [accessed May 7, 2020].
Flyverbom, Mikkel, Anders. K. Madsen, and Andreas Rasche. 2017. Big Data as Governmentality in International Development: Digital Traces, Algorithms, and Altered Visibilities. The Information Society 33 (1): 35–42.
Fried, Charles. 2009. Privacy: A Moral Analysis. In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, edited by Ferdinand D. Schoeman, 203–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gusy, Christoph, Johannes Eichenhofer, and Laura Schulte. 2016. e-privacy. Von der Digitalisierung der Kommunikation zur Digitalisierung der Privatsphäre. Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 64: 385–409.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1963. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main, DE: Suhrkamp.
Helm, Paula. 2018. Treating Sensitive Topics Online: A Privacy Dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology 20 (4): 303–13.
Helm, Paula, and Johannes Eichenhofer. 2019. Reflektionen zu einem social turn in den Privacy Studies. In Privatheit und Digitalisierung, edited by Martin Henning, Christian Aldenhoff, Lukas Edeler, Martin Hennig, Jacob Kelsch, Lea Raabe, and Felix Solaba, 139–166. Bielefeld, DE: Transcript.
Hiltzik, Michael. 2019. Ex-Google Manager Leads a Drive to Rein in the Pernicious Impact of Social Media. The Los Angeles Times, May 10. https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-tristan-tech-20190510-story.html [accessed May 7, 2020].
Hobbs, Rene. 1998. The Seven Great Debates in the Media Literacy Movement. Journal of Communication 48: 6–32.
Honneth, Axel, and Ferdinand Sutterlüty. 2012. Normative Paradoxien der Gegenwart. In Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen, edited by Hans-Georg Soeffner, 897–909. Wiesbaden, DE: Springer.
———. 2011. Normative Paradoxien der Gegenwart. Ein Forschungsprogramm. Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 8 (1): 67–85.
Hornung, Gerrit. 2015. Informationelle Selbstbestimmung oder Privatheit? Zu den semantischen und normativen Unterschieden verschiedener Konzepte des Persönlichkeitsschutzes im „digitalen“ Zeitalter. Presented at the Konferenz des forums privatheit „Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung,” November 2015. Berlin, Germany. https://www.forum-privatheit.de/forum-privatheit-de/aktuelles/veranstaltungen/veranstal- tungsdokumente/2015-11-26u27_dokumentation_zukunft-der-informationellen-selbstbestim- mung/1.1.c-Hornung-Gerrit-V ortrag-Berlin-151126.pdf [accessed May 7, 2020].
Isin, Eigin, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2015. Being Digital Citizens. London, UK: Roman International.
Lankshear, Colin, and Michele Knobel. 2008. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Lever, Annabelle. 2012. On Privacy. London, UK: Routledge.
Levy, Karen, and Solon Barocas. 2017. Designing Against Discrimination in Online Markets. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 32 (3): 1183–237.
Livingstone, Sonja. 2004. Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies. The Communication Review 7: 3–14.
Locke, John. (1690) 2006. Two Treaties on Government. Farmington Hill, MI: Thomson Gale.
Lyon, David. 2015. Surveillance after Snowden. Malden, MA: Polity Press
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Madden, Mary, Michele Gilman, Karen Levy, and Alice Marwick. 2017. Privacy, Poverty, and Big Data: A Matrix of Vulnerabilities for Poor Americans. Washington University Law Review 95: 53–118.
Martens, Hana, and Renee Hobbs. 2015. How Media Literacy Supports Civic Engagement in a Digital Age. Atlantic Journal of Communication 23 (2): 120–137).
Mayer-Schönberger, Victor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data. A Revolution that will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
McDonald, Aleecia M., and Lorrie F. Cranor. 2008. The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4 (3): 540–65.
Milan, Stefania, and Lonneke van der Velden. 2016. The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism. Digital Culture & Society 2 (2): 57–74.
Mill, John S. (1859) 2001. On Liberty. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech University Press.
Murakami Wood, David, and Monahan, Torin. 2019. Editorial: Platform Surveillance. Surveillance and Society 17 (1/2): 1–6.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2016. Affective Publics and Structures of Storytelling: Sentiment, Events and Mediality. Information, Communication & Society 19 (3): 307–324.
Pateman, Carole. 1989. Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy. In The Disorder of Women. Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory, edited by Carole Pateman, 118–140. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
Reiman, Jeffrey. 1995. Driving to the Panopticon: A Philosophical Exploration of the Risks to Privacy Posed by the Highway Technology of the Future. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 11 (27): 27–44.
Roßnagel, Alexander, Christian Geminn, Maxi Nebel, and Tamer Bile. 2019. Evaluation der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung. Policy Paper des Forums Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der digitalen Welt. Karlsruhe, DE: Forum Privatheit.
Rössler, Beate. 2015. Should Personal Data Be a Tradable Good? On the Moral Limits of Markets in Privacy. In Social Dimensions of Privacy, edited by Beate Rössler and Dorota Mokrosinska, 141–161. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitz, Amy J. 2014. Secret Consumer Scores and Segmentations: Separating Consumer “Haves” from “Have- Nots.” 2014 Michigan State Law Review: 1411–26.
Seubert, Seubert, and Carlos Becker. 2019. The Culture Industry Revisited: Socio-Critical Reflection on the Value of Privacy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (8): 930–947.
Sevignani, Sebastian. 2016. Privacy and Capitalism in the Age of Social Media. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sloan, Robert H., and Richard Warner. 2013. Beyond Notice and Choice: Privacy, Norms, and Consent. J. High Tech. L.: 370–412.
Solove, Daniel. 2008. The End of Privacy? Scientific American 299 (3): 100–106.
Sprenger, Polly. 1999. Sun on Privacy: “Get Over It.” Wired, January 26. https://www.wired.com/1999/01/sun-on-privacy-get-over-it/ [accessed May 7, 2020].
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Malden, MA: Polity.
———. 2019. Platform Monopolies and the Political Economy of AI. In Economies for the Many, edited by John McDonnell, 152–163. London, UK: Verso.
Taylor, Linnet. 2017. What Is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally. SSRN, June 28. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2918779 [accessed September 10, 2018].
Trepte, Sabine, Doris Teutsch, Philip Masur, Sabine Trepte, Doris Teutsch, Philipp K. Masur, Carolin, Mona Fischer, Alisa Hennhöfer, and Fabienne Lind. 2015. Do People Know About Privacy and Data Protection Strategies? Towards the "Online Privacy Literacy Scale" (OPLIS). In Reforming European Data Protection Law, edited by Serge Gutwirth, Ronald Leenes, and Paul de Hert, 333–65. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
van Dijck, José, Martijn Waal, and Thomas Poell. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review IV (5): 193–220.
Westin, Allan. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.
WhatsApp. 2018. WhatsApp Terms of Service. April 24. https://www.whatsapp.com/legal?eea=1 - privacy-policy-information-we-collect [accessed August 20, 2019].
———. 2020a. End-to-End Encryption. https://faq.whatsapp.com/en/android/28030015/ [accessed May 7, 2020].
———. 2020b. Usage of Your Phone Number and Address Book. https://faq.whatsapp.com/en/iphone/20971813 [accessed May 7, 2020].
Whitman, James Q. 2004. The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty. The Yale Law Journal 113: 1151–1221.
Xu Feng, Michael Katina, and Chen Xi. 2013. Factors Affecting Privacy Disclosure on Social Network Sites: An Integrated Model. Electronic Commerce Research 13 (2): 151–168.
Zimmermann, Philip. 1999. Why I wrote PGP. Phil Zimmermann (blog), June. https://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html [accessed August 12, 2019].