Exploitation–Exploration Model of Media Multitasking
Abstract
Abstract. Media multitasking has been long considered as a distraction, as something that is inherently negative or irrational. Yet, casual observations and study findings indicate that in the current permanently online, permanently connected society, people still media multitask frequently, sometimes in spite of their knowledge of the costs. In this article, we introduce the exploitation–exploration model of media multitasking (EEMMM), which proposes that media multitasking occurs as a natural part of the waxing and waning of our task engagement: When primary task engagement (exploitation) begins to wane, alternative tasks become more attractive (exploration). In the first part of this paper, we delineate the limitations of the current perspective of media multitasking as a distraction. The second part provides an exposition for our model: What defines behavior exploitation and exploration, and why maintaining an optimal trade-off between the two is important; the everyday, media-related cues for exploiting and exploring; and the neurobiological evidence of a brain system that supports the transition from exploitation to exploration. Lastly, we show how our approach may explain why people media multitask spontaneously and in spite of their knowledge of the costs, and why not all media multitaskers are able to multitask optimally. We conclude the paper with an agenda for future media multitasking research based on the proposed framework.
References
2015). Media multitasking, attention, and distraction: A critical discussion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9375-x
(2018a). Magnetic and multistable: Reinterpreting the affordances of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0088-4
(2018b). Multitasking as distraction: A conceptual analysis of media multitasking research. Theory & Psychology, 29(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318815766
(2017). A primer on foraging and the explore/exploit trade-off for psychiatry research. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42(10), 1931–1939. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.108
(2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x
(2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28(1), 403–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
(2010). Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb
(2008).
(Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control . In J. E. KatzEd., Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 177–193). MIT Press.2010). The use of media entertainment and emotional gratification. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.444
(2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(8), 1120–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614523133
(2021). Not all media multitasking is the same: The frequency of media multitasking depends on cognitive and affective characteristics of media combinations. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000338
(2020). Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944
(2014). The exploration-exploitation dilemma: A multidisciplinary framework. PLoS One, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095693
(2003). The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: Modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews, 42(1), 33–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(03)00143-7
(2018). Pure correlates of exploration and exploitation in the human brain. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0556-2
(2005). Network reset: A simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function. Trends in Neurosciences, 28(11), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2005.09.002
(2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024
(2011). Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(9), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0350
(2017). Media multitasking: How visual cues affect switching behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.042
(2018). Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 82(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0919-x
(2017). Multitasking as a choice: A perspective. Psychological Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0938-7
(2000). Strategy application disorder: The role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004269900006
(2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers and Education, 75, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004
(2015). Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.005
(2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
(2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69(4), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.020
(2017). Fractionating impulsivity: Neuropsychiatric implications. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(3), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.8
(2017). The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: Overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9159-5
(2017, November 27). Global Mobile Consumer Survey Southeast Asia Edition. https://www2.deloitte.com
. (2014). Doing it all: An Exploratory study of predictors of media multitasking. journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2014.884480
(2008). Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(5), 1704–1709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707727105
(2014). Metacognition of multitasking: How well do we predict the costs of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 20(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000010
(2009). Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI. Science, 322(October 2015), 1700–1703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164908
(2010). Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.252
(1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
(2002). The effects of background music on primary school pupils’ task performance. Educational Studies, 28(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690220124551
(2020). Individual differences in local and global metacognitive judgments. Metacognition and Learning, 15(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09220-0
(2014). Why do media users multitask? Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.040
(2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009
(2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532948
(2011). Pupil Diameter predicts changes in the exploration–exploitation trade-off: Evidence for the adaptive gain theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1587–1596. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21548
(2014). What happens when we switch tasks: Pupil dilation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000031
(1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.
(1974). Uses of mass communication by the individual. In The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32).
(2009). Choosing to switch: Spontaneous task switching despite associated behavioral costs. Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.005
(2010). Control and interference in task switching-a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842
(2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.052
(2016). If I choose when to switch: Heavy multitaskers remember online content better than light multitaskers when they have the freedom to multitask. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.011
(2014). A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031048
(1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2011.2173980
(2009).
(The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing . In R. L. NabiM. B. OliversEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204).2016). Predicting tablet use: A study of gratifications-sought, leisure boredom, and multitasking. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.013
(2016). How has the Internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 5, 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415595005
(2017). The relations between executive functions, media multitasking and polychronicity. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.011
(2015). Focused, aroused, but so distractible: A temporal perspective on multitasking and communications. CSCW ‘15 Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675221
(2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human–computer interaction. Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, 17, 63–139.
(2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6
(2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
(2014). Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus. Human Brain Mapping, 35(8), 4140–4154. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22466
(1984). Resources – a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.216
(2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
(2013). Predicting interference in concurrent multitasking. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Cognitive Modeling.
(2013). Decision making in concurrent multitasking: Do people adapt to task interference? PLoS One, 8(11), Article e79583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079583
(2014). Left to their own devices. Communication Research, 41(4), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213499657
(1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
(2013). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78(5), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7
(2005). The effect of music on cognitive performance: Insight from neurobiological and animal studies. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(4), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582305285869
(2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year-olds. In The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://doi.org/P0-446179799-1366925520306
(2008). Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101
(2011). Toward a unified view of cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01134.x
(2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers and Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
(2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS One, 8(1), Article e54402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402
(2009). The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2573
(2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11340917
(2017). I want to media multitask and I want to do it now: Individual differences in media multitasking predict delay of gratification and system-1 thinking. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0048-x
(2017). Insight into everyday media use with multiple screens. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348042
(2019). Media use in the European Union. (Issue November). https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/82786
. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00386
(2013). Driving with music: Effects on arousal and performance. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.004
(2017). Media multitasking and cognitive, psychological, neural, and learning differences. Pediatrics, 140(November). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758D
(2018). The minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9889–9896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115
(2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035
(2012). The influence of music on mood and performance while driving. Ergonomics, 55(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.638403
(2013). Using music to change mood while driving. Ergonomics, 56(10), 1504–1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.825013
(2018).
(Permanently online, permanently connected: A new paradigm in communication research? . In P. VordererD. HefnerL. ReineckeC. KlimmtEds., Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC World. Routledge.2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 102–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12042
(2009). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x
(2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
(2014). Humans use directed and random exploration to solve the explore–exploit dilemma. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2074–2081.
(2019). Everyday functioning-related cognitive correlates of media multitasking: A mini meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1685393
(2017). Cognitive control in media multitaskers: Two replication studies and a meta-Analysis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(8), 2620–2641. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1408-4
(2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12070
(1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Scientist, 31(3), 327–340.
(