Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus in children

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Osteochondral talar defects are infrequent in children, and little is known about the treatment and clinical outcome of these defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of conservative and primary surgically treated osteochondral talar defects in skeletally immature children.

Methods

Thirty-six (97 %) of 37 eligible patients with a symptomatic primary osteochondral talar defect were evaluated after a median follow-up of 4 years (range 1–12 years). Clinical assessment included the Berndt and Harty outcome question, Ogilvie-Harris score, Visual Analog Scale pain score (at rest, during walking and during running), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the SF-36. Weight-bearing radiographs were compared with preoperative radiographs with the use of an ankle osteoarthritis classification system.

Results

Ninety-two per cent of the initially conservatively treated children [mean age 13 years (SD 2)] were eventually scheduled to undergo surgery. After fixation of the fragment, seven cases (78 %) reported a good Berndt and Harty outcome, and two cases (22 %) a fair outcome; the median AOFAS score was 95.0 (range 77–100). After debridement and bone marrow stimulation, 13 cases (62 %) reported a good Berndt and Harty outcome, three cases (14 %) a fair outcome, and five cases (24 %) a poor outcome; the median AOFAS score was 95.0 (range 45–100). No signs of degenerative changes were seen in both groups at follow-up.

Conclusions

Fixation and debridement and bone marrow stimulation of an osteochondral talar defect are both good surgical options after failed conservative treatment.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Therapeutic, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R et al (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1055–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker CL Jr, Morales RW (1999) Arthroscopic treatment of transchondral talar dome fractures: a long-term follow-up study. Arthroscopy 15:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benthien RA, Sullivan RJ, Aronow MS (2002) Adolescent osteochondral lesion of the talus. Ankle arthroscopy in pediatric patients. Foot Ankle Clin 7:651–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-A:988–1020

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruns J, Rosenbach B (1992) Osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus. Comparison of results of surgical treatment in adolescents and adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112:23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erban WK, Kolberg K (1981) Simultaneous mirror image osteochondrosis dissecans in identical twins. Rofo 135:357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferkel RD, Scranton PE Jr (1993) Arthroscopy of the ankle and foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1233–1242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gautier E, Kolker D, Jakob RP (2002) Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:237–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Cavallo M, Grigolo B (2009) One-step bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in talar osteochondral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:3307–3320

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Higuera J, Laguna R, Peral M, Aranda E, Soleto J (1998) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus during childhood and adolescence. J Pediatr Orthop 18:328–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt SA, Sherman O (2003) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with correlation of outcome scoring systems. Arthroscopy 19:360–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK (2007) Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karrholm J, Hansson LI, Selvik G (1984) Longitudinal growth rate of the distal tibia and fibula in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 191:121–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumai T, Takakura Y, Higashiyama I, Tamai S (1999) Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1229–1235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumai T, Takakura Y, Kitada C, Tanaka Y, Hayashi K (2002) Fixation of osteochondral lesions of the talus using cortical bone pegs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:369–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Letts M, Davidson D, Ahmer A (2003) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 23:617–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCullough CJ, Venugopal V (1979) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: the natural history. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:264–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Schmal H, Mayr H, Südkamp NP (2012) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the talus: a meta-analysis of available evidence. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1696–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Mahomed N, Demaziere A (1993) Anterior impingement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:437–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raikin SM (2004) Stage VI: massive osteochondral defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Clin 9:737–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reilingh ML, van Dijk CN (2011) Comments on: “osteochondral lesions of the talus: current concept” by O. Laffenetre published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 554–66. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:461–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schachter AK, Chen AL, Reddy PD, Tejwani NC (2005) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:152–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schuh A, Salminen S, Zeiler G, Schraml A (2004) Results of fixation of osteochondral lesions of the talus using K-wires. Zentralbl Chir 129:470–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schuman L, Struijs PA, van Dijk CN (2002) Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus. Results at follow-up at 2 to 11 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:364–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scranton PE Jr, McDermott JE (2001) Treatment of type V osteochondral lesions of the talus with ipsilateral knee osteochondral autografts. Foot Ankle Int 22:380–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tol JL, Struijs PA, Bossuyt PM, Verhagen RA, van Dijk CN (2000) Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int 21:119–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Bergen CJ, Kox LS, Maas M, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN (2013) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Bergen CJ, Tuijthof GJ, Blankevoort L, Maas M, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN (2012) Computed tomography of the ankle in full plantar flexion: a reliable method for preoperative planning of arthroscopic access to osteochondral defects of the talus. Arthroscopy 28:985–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergen CJ (2010) Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:570–580

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Dijk CN, Verhagen RA, Tol JL (1997) Arthroscopy for problems after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B (1998) Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:903–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woods K, Harris I (1995) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in identical twins. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:238–246

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zengerink M, van Dijk CN (2012) Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1420–1431

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. M. J. Kerkhoffs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reilingh, M.L., Kerkhoffs, G.M.M.J., Telkamp, C.J.A. et al. Treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus in children. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 2243–2249 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2685-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2685-7

Keywords

Navigation